e7f9616b39
The new test system is written with py.test. These tests are more comprehensive, run faster by an order of magnitude, and are far more maintainable. The tests themselves conform to PEP8.
112 lines
3.9 KiB
Python
112 lines
3.9 KiB
Python
"""Test perms"""
|
|
|
|
import os
|
|
import warnings
|
|
import pytest
|
|
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.parametrize('autoperms', ['notest', 'unset', 'true', 'false'])
|
|
@pytest.mark.usefixtures('ds1_copy')
|
|
def test_perms(runner, yadm_y, paths, ds1, autoperms):
|
|
"""Test perms"""
|
|
# set the value of auto-perms
|
|
if autoperms != 'notest':
|
|
if autoperms != 'unset':
|
|
os.system(' '.join(yadm_y('config', 'yadm.auto-perms', autoperms)))
|
|
|
|
# privatepaths will hold all paths that should become secured
|
|
privatepaths = [paths.work.join('.ssh'), paths.work.join('.gnupg')]
|
|
privatepaths += [paths.work.join(private.path) for private in ds1.private]
|
|
|
|
# create an archive file
|
|
os.system(f'touch "{str(paths.archive)}"')
|
|
privatepaths.append(paths.archive)
|
|
|
|
# create encrypted file test data
|
|
efile1 = paths.work.join('efile1')
|
|
efile1.write('efile1')
|
|
efile2 = paths.work.join('efile2')
|
|
efile2.write('efile2')
|
|
paths.encrypt.write('efile1\nefile2\n!efile1\n')
|
|
insecurepaths = [efile1]
|
|
privatepaths.append(efile2)
|
|
|
|
# assert these paths begin unsecured
|
|
for private in privatepaths + insecurepaths:
|
|
assert not oct(private.stat().mode).endswith('00'), (
|
|
'Path started secured')
|
|
|
|
cmd = 'perms'
|
|
if autoperms != 'notest':
|
|
cmd = 'status'
|
|
run = runner(yadm_y(cmd))
|
|
assert run.success
|
|
assert run.err == ''
|
|
if cmd == 'perms':
|
|
assert run.out == ''
|
|
|
|
# these paths should be secured if processing perms
|
|
for private in privatepaths:
|
|
if '.p2' in private.basename or '.p4' in private.basename:
|
|
# Dot files within .ssh/.gnupg are not protected.
|
|
# This is a but which must be fixed
|
|
warnings.warn('Unhandled bug: private dot files', Warning)
|
|
continue
|
|
if autoperms == 'false':
|
|
assert not oct(private.stat().mode).endswith('00'), (
|
|
'Path should not be secured')
|
|
else:
|
|
assert oct(private.stat().mode).endswith('00'), (
|
|
'Path has not been secured')
|
|
|
|
# these paths should never be secured
|
|
for private in insecurepaths:
|
|
assert not oct(private.stat().mode).endswith('00'), (
|
|
'Path should not be secured')
|
|
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.parametrize('sshperms', [None, 'true', 'false'])
|
|
@pytest.mark.parametrize('gpgperms', [None, 'true', 'false'])
|
|
@pytest.mark.usefixtures('ds1_copy')
|
|
def test_perms_control(runner, yadm_y, paths, ds1, sshperms, gpgperms):
|
|
"""Test fine control of perms"""
|
|
# set the value of ssh-perms
|
|
if sshperms:
|
|
os.system(' '.join(yadm_y('config', 'yadm.ssh-perms', sshperms)))
|
|
|
|
# set the value of gpg-perms
|
|
if gpgperms:
|
|
os.system(' '.join(yadm_y('config', 'yadm.gpg-perms', gpgperms)))
|
|
|
|
# privatepaths will hold all paths that should become secured
|
|
privatepaths = [paths.work.join('.ssh'), paths.work.join('.gnupg')]
|
|
privatepaths += [paths.work.join(private.path) for private in ds1.private]
|
|
|
|
# assert these paths begin unsecured
|
|
for private in privatepaths:
|
|
assert not oct(private.stat().mode).endswith('00'), (
|
|
'Path started secured')
|
|
|
|
run = runner(yadm_y('perms'))
|
|
assert run.success
|
|
assert run.err == ''
|
|
assert run.out == ''
|
|
|
|
# these paths should be secured if processing perms
|
|
for private in privatepaths:
|
|
if '.p2' in private.basename or '.p4' in private.basename:
|
|
# Dot files within .ssh/.gnupg are not protected.
|
|
# This is a but which must be fixed
|
|
warnings.warn('Unhandled bug: private dot files', Warning)
|
|
continue
|
|
if (
|
|
(sshperms == 'false' and 'ssh' in str(private))
|
|
or
|
|
(gpgperms == 'false' and 'gnupg' in str(private))
|
|
):
|
|
assert not oct(private.stat().mode).endswith('00'), (
|
|
'Path should not be secured')
|
|
else:
|
|
assert oct(private.stat().mode).endswith('00'), (
|
|
'Path has not been secured')
|